<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ben Ward &#187; email</title>
	<atom:link href="http://benward.me/blog/tags/email/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://benward.me</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 03:23:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Unsubscribe/Unarchive</title>
		<link>http://benward.me/mint/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fbenward.me%2Fblog%2Funsubscribe-unarchive&amp;seed_title=Unsubscribe%2FUnarchive</link>
		<comments>http://benward.me/mint/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fbenward.me%2Fblog%2Funsubscribe-unarchive&amp;seed_title=Unsubscribe%2FUnarchive#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Ward's Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project52]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benward.me/?p=569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is value in email, and that value is communication. Over years, service providers and publishers have taken advantage of email's ubiquity to adapt it for push, notification and automation. Better solutions to those use cases are emerging (or already exist), so this is the time to reclaim the inbox, reduce your email throughput back to what the medium is really good for. I've already seen that a little bit of persistent effort can greatly increase the quality of email as a tool.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The evolution in the use of email is quite interesting. Choices we make to balance our communicative overhead, choices others make in the kinds of information they prefer to distribute via email over other mediums, how we react to those changes and learn from reactions. Email is a valuable case study of internet behaviour as it&#8217;s been with us since the start, and it&#8217;s never going to go away either. No matter how strongly the bleeding edges of the technology industry push different forms of communication; wikis, Waves, activity streams and so forth, people will always have a need for medium to long form, considered, chronological communication (and even if it&#8217;s not the most efficient, they&#8217;ll do it anyway.)</p>

	<p>Every change we make to our email behaviour, whether it&#8217;s organisation, tools or simply trying to email less, we are trying to find an effective balance. I&#8217;ve just come out the other side of one change, and am spending a few weeks making a strong, conscious effort in response.</p>

	<p>At this point, my email inbox tends to receive the following: Notifications (from services), content summaries, status changes, reminders; pushed information, newsletters, aggregate news; actual communication, enquiries, conversations, planning and social synchronisation.</p>

	<p>My email clients of choice is Mail on Mac <span class="caps">OSX</span>, and Mail on my iPhone. Previously I used Gmail from Google, but I quit the service because I found the browser-based user interface clumsy,  and the application as a whole aesthetically ugly. Mac <span class="caps">OSX</span>&#8217;s user interface is elegant, the display of email good for reading, and the desktop client remains robust. My email is on an <span class="caps">IMAP</span> server (because that&#8217;s how email should be accessed), and I can fall back to my service provider&#8212;<a href="http://fastmail.fm" title="">Fastmail</a> &#8212;for a clean and functional web interface if I&#8217;m ever away from my main machine. I have also developed a certain wariness of storing too much of my data with Google for free, and prefer to pay for the excellent service I now get.</p>

	<p>Gripes with Gmail as an application remain, but Gmail did massively inform my email behaviour. Most importantly, archiving rather than deletion. I carried over that practice to my new host, and now have some four years worth of email archived on my machine, and backed up around the world. I can, if needed, find pretty much any piece of mail given the right parameters. Not that I will ever need to see most of that mail again. But archiving is easy for a while, and my compulsive nature makes thorough archiving desirable.</p>

	<p>I organise my mailboxes annually. Each year I archive everything from the previous year into an annual parent mailbox, effectively removing all the top-level mail folders from my account hierarchy. I start each year with a bare &#8216;Inbox&#8217;, &#8216;Drafts&#8217;, &#8216;Sent&#8217;, &#8216;Archive&#8217; folder set, and then the categorical mailboxes get recreated when the first relevant piece of mail comes in. Some get recreated within a day, others never come back. For what it&#8217;s worth, I&#8217;ve always found a simple tree structure to be entirely sufficient for organising email; I never proved multi-dimensional tagging to actually be useful in Gmail.</p>

	<p>Although my archive routine is simple, it is slowing me down. Huge amount of archived data, most of it useless. So I have all of my domain renewal notifications? Why? To keep a record of when my registrars have been in contact, so that I know exactly when I was reminded of particular actions. That is an example of me choosing the simplicity of the archive action instead of making a good-value decision about what is worth archiving. I&#8217;ve now accrued too much information to effectively dig through.</p>

	<p>So, my first email goal from now on is to archive <em>less</em>. To trash messages that are of low value. Being an archivist, completist and pedant is an unhelpful email trait.</p>

	<p>Years of signing up for services means that I get a regular stream of automated or blind-mailed content from services. This email I do delete. But because the effort of performing a delete action is so low I have tolerated an increasing quantity of mail for years. The processing cost is low, but occurs frequently and at irregular intervals. The problem is exacerbated in a mobile environment, where a &#8216;new message&#8217; notification triggers a significant interruption. That interruption would be appropriate for valuable, personal communication.</p>

	<p>As well as notifications, I receive a small amount of actual content by email as well; most notably the daily <a href="http://channel4.com/news/snowmail" title="">Snowmail</a> email from Channel 4 News in the UK. Unfortunately, that content is only distributed by email, and is not published as a blog. This is content I read, of value, but is not content that should be pushed to me, it&#8217;s content I should pull up at my convenience.</p>

	<p>My second email goal is to reduce the amount of email I receive in my inbox to be 95% personal communication. This has meant that every day for the past two weeks, I&#8217;ve actually taken the extra time to find the unsubscribe link in the footer, or edit the communication preferences of whichever service is sending notifications, and permanently disable it. I suspect it will take months to clear all of them, since some services are very infrequent in their mailings, but already I&#8217;m finding that if my iPhone vibrates, then the message I&#8217;ve received is now most often of actual interest.</p>

	<p>Newsletters require more work. Email is the wrong delivery mechanism; they should not be push content in the first place. So I&#8217;m going to experiment with subscribing a blog-by-email address to the mailing list in question, so I can convert the content into an <span class="caps">RSS</span> feed and have it consumed by <a href="http://feedafever.com" title="">Fever</a> instead.</p>

	<p>There is value in email, and that value is communication. Over years, service providers and publishers have taken advantage of email&#8217;s ubiquity to adapt it for push, notification and automation. Better solutions to those use cases are emerging (or already exist), so this is the time to reclaim the inbox, reduce your email throughput back to what the medium is really good for. I&#8217;ve already seen that a little bit of persistent effort can greatly increase the quality of email as a tool.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://benward.me/mint/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fbenward.me%2Fblog%2Funsubscribe-unarchive&amp;seed_title=Unsubscribe%2FUnarchive/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Phishing nets</title>
		<link>http://benward.me/mint/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fbenward.me%2Fblog%2Fphishing-nets&amp;seed_title=Phishing+nets</link>
		<comments>http://benward.me/mint/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fbenward.me%2Fblog%2Fphishing-nets&amp;seed_title=Phishing+nets#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 23:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ben Ward's Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail.app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paypal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ben-ward.co.uk/journal/phishing-nets/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Phishing. What a stupid word. Lord knows how we&#8217;ll persuade regular computer consumers to adapt to it. This is quick and techie-friendly anti-phishing technique, and a Mail.app gripe.

	For those of us more tech-savvy (and in possession of multiple email aliases), I twigged upon a simple technique to neuter scam mails without causing the spam filter [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Phishing. What a stupid word. Lord knows how we&#8217;ll persuade regular computer consumers to adapt to it. This is quick and techie-friendly anti-phishing technique, and a Mail.app gripe.</p>

	<p>For those of us more tech-savvy (and in possession of multiple email aliases), I twigged upon a simple technique to neuter scam mails without causing the spam filter to start mis-filtering legitimate PayPal receipts.</p>

	<p>Very simply: I have unique email forwarding addresses for each scam-favoured service I use. Ebay, PayPal and my bank all have unique addresses. Then I have a rule in Mail that checks if an email <em>from</em> PayPal has actually been sent <em>to</em> the genuine PayPal address (they never are). At the moment they highlight mismatching messages in a lovely shade of red, but once I&#8217;ve seen it work properly for a few days I&#8217;ll start deleting them automatically. It should work so long as said genuine email addresses remain unpublished for spam crawlers to pick up. This isn&#8217;t perfect, since I know of at least one place that my PayPal address is published right now, but at the very least it will counter <strong>most</strong> of the scams, and the eBay and banking addresses are certainly secret.</p>

	<p>PayPal and eBay are easy, it&#8217;s a one-to-one service domain to email address mapping. Banks should be just as easy, just requiring a list of banking domain names rather than one. Except, for some unfathomable reason, Mail.app on <span class="caps">OSX</span> doesn&#8217;t seem to support boolean expressions in its mail filters. In fact, so simple is Mail&#8217;s system it only allows you to enforce <em>all</em> conditions or any. This rule must match both (the banks domain and my genuine address), but it looks like I&#8217;ll have to create a dozen different rules to match the unique bank domains. A quick Google revealed nothing, so does anyone know if Mail can support more advanced string matching? Extensions/stable hacks or scripts are fine, so long as they&#8217;re run on messages automatically.</p>

	<p>Any other techniques you use to avoid breaking your spam filter?</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://benward.me/mint/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fbenward.me%2Fblog%2Fphishing-nets&amp;seed_title=Phishing+nets/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roundcube Webmail</title>
		<link>http://benward.me/mint/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fbenward.me%2Fblog%2Froundcube-webmail&amp;seed_title=Roundcube+Webmail</link>
		<comments>http://benward.me/mint/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fbenward.me%2Fblog%2Froundcube-webmail&amp;seed_title=Roundcube+Webmail#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 17:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roundcube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webmail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ben-ward.co.uk/journal/roundcube-webmail/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Some time ago I stopped using Gmail. I was criticising it increasingly regularly and it seemed only right that I should explore alternatives. The alternative I&#8217;ve been settled on since then has been IMAP, in combination with Thunderbird on PC and Mail.app on the Mac. That&#8217;s worthy of a separate post at some point, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Some time ago I stopped using Gmail. I was criticising it increasingly regularly and it seemed only right that I should explore alternatives. The alternative I&#8217;ve been settled on since then has been <span class="caps">IMAP</span>, in combination with Thunderbird on PC and Mail.app on the Mac. That&#8217;s worthy of a separate post at some point, but one big step backwards I did find was the occasional need for webmail access.</p>

	<p>Now, SquirrelMail I&#8217;m not a fan of. With that in mind, I&#8217;d been meaning to install <a href="http://roundcube.net">Roundcube</a> for a while. It&#8217;s a beautiful new webmail system using quite lovely modern mark-up with a smattering of Ajax, drag &#38; drop and a lovely mac-esque Pinstripe theme. It&#8217;s reasonably responsive, as much as <span class="caps">IMAP</span> ever seems to be, and can load up larger <span class="caps">IMAP</span> folders without any time outs of memory overuse (a problem I have with SquirrelMail). Certainly it makes for a lovely interface to use when I&#8217;ve away from my main machine.</p>

	<p>Disappointingly the JavaScript-licious UI doesn&#8217;t degrade gracefully which means I can&#8217;t use Roundcube in Opera Mini. It&#8217;s a big downside for me, since SquirrelMail sucks in Opera Mini (all the header fields get cleared when you reply to a message).</p>

	<p>So, I&#8217;m still looking for a fast, clean and tidy <span class="caps">IMAP</span> webapp that functions purely in <span class="caps">HTML</span> and <span class="caps">CSS</span>. I&#8217;m tempted to see if Roundcube&#8217;s core code is robust enough to build a static <span class="caps">HTML</span> interface from, but that requires time I&#8217;m unlikely to find. Recommendations?</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://benward.me/mint/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fbenward.me%2Fblog%2Froundcube-webmail&amp;seed_title=Roundcube+Webmail/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
